Iranian President’s Death Leads to Internal Crisis in the Country

The unexpected death of Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi, confirmed on Monday (20), comes at a critical moment in Middle East politics. The region is currently witnessing a war between Israel and Hamas, and the internal stability of Iran is also in question. Raisi was considered one of the top contenders to succeed Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as the supreme leader of Iran, the highest authority in the country responsible for leading the Armed Forces and directing foreign policy.

Following Raisi’s death in a helicopter accident, Iran will have to undergo a new mandatory electoral process in June. In the meantime, an interim government will take over public functions and organize the election by creating a council consisting of the president of the Assembly and the head of the Judiciary. There are concerns about potential destabilization in the country, but the government has indicated that work will continue without interruption, following Raisi’s hard-line model.

One of the main challenges facing Iran after Raisi’s death is the question of who will succeed Khamenei as the supreme leader. While Raisi was seen as a potential successor, his death has left a void, and there is uncertainty about who will fill that role. The second nominee for the position is thought to be one of Khamenei’s sons, Mojtaba Khamenei, but his appointment would deviate from the current political system established in Iran after the overthrow of the monarchy in 1979.

The upcoming elections will be crucial in determining the future of Iran’s leadership and the direction of the Islamic regime. Various potential candidates have been mentioned, including former Speaker of Parliament Ali Larijani, former President Hassan Rouhani, and former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The outcome of the elections will shed light on what lies ahead for Iran in terms of governance and policy decisions.

Despite the challenges and uncertainties surrounding Raisi’s death, experts believe that the fundamental nature of Iran’s regime is unlikely to change significantly. The supreme leader holds the ultimate power in the country, with the president playing a symbolic role and implementing policies dictated by the supreme leader. Iran’s regional leadership and foreign policy objectives, including its stance on Israel and its nuclear program, are also expected to remain consistent.

Economic challenges, human rights concerns, and regional dynamics all contribute to the complexity of Iran’s political landscape. The country is facing inflation and social unrest, and the regime’s crackdown on dissent has raised international scrutiny. The future of Iran’s leadership will have implications not only for domestic stability but also for regional politics and global security.