The Big Ten Conference, rather than polls, should determine the College Football Playoff teams

The 12-team College Football Playoff will present opportunities for the Big Ten Conference, but it will also lead to headaches and debates. To navigate this new landscape successfully, the conference must proactively address potential conflicts that may arise among member schools, coaches, and players before they become significant issues.

One possible scenario that could unfold in the Big Ten (and other power conferences) involves the top two teams securing spots in the College Football Playoff before the conference championship game. This sets the stage for a debate over the teams ranked third, fourth, and fifth. For instance, what if the third- and fourth-place teams are scheduled to play each other late in the season, while the fifth-place team is still in contention for a playoff spot? How should the conference address this situation to ensure fairness and clarity?

In discussions on The Voice of College Football, Mark Rogers and Trojans Wire writer Tim Prangley explore various scenarios that could play out. Mark emphasizes the importance of the Big Ten resolving these intra-conference disputes independently, rather than relying on a national rankings system or external polls to make decisions. This approach ensures that the conference maintains control over playoff considerations and avoids potential conflicts with national guidelines.

As the College Football Playoff expands and new challenges emerge, it will be crucial for conferences like the Big Ten to iron out these details in advance. By addressing potential disputes early and setting clear guidelines for playoff selection, the conference can help its member schools navigate the postseason with confidence and clarity.