The AUR party has announced that it plans to subject its cadres to a polygraphic test in order to create transparency for voters and demonstrate loyalty to the party. In the world of politics, honesty is often questioned, especially during election campaigns when promises are made that are later forgotten. This is a common issue in Romania, where four important elections will take place this year, including parliamentary and presidential elections.
The nationalist Alliance for the Unification of Romanians (AUR) is aiming to build trust with citizens in this crucial election year. The right-wing protest party has requested that its candidates and local members undergo a lie detector test. According to party spokesperson Dan Tanasa, the test is designed to ensure transparency for voters and verify the loyalty of party members. Party president George Simion has stated that those who show fear or resistance to the test are likely to be unreliable in times of need.
Simion himself set an example by taking a polygraph test and answering questions about his integrity. However, experts have raised concerns that a brief test may not be sufficient for a serious examination. Additionally, the provider of the lie detector has ties to a company known for conducting truth tests on prominent individuals in front of cameras, adding a theatrical element to the process.
AUR has faced internal disputes and accusations of serving Russian interests in the past. The party advocates for national and Christian values, criticizing the Euro-Atlantic institutions and portraying the EU as exploitative. Some party members have proposed incorporating Romanian minority areas into Ukraine, further fueling suspicions of pro-Russian sentiments. Simion, the party president, has been banned from entering Ukraine and Moldova.
Despite doubts surrounding the party’s alleged pro-Russian stance, AUR hopes that the lie detector tests will dispel these rumors and build trust with voters. This move comes at a critical time as the party prepares for upcoming elections and faces scrutiny over internal conflicts and controversial candidate choices.