The plaintiffs in this case are working to establish a connection between protest organizations at US universities and Hamas, aiming to bring awareness to the conduct of students participating in protests and their supporters. They also seek to hinder these organizations from raising funds and operating on campuses, while demanding additional information as part of the legal process. The lawsuit involves Israeli and American citizens who were victims of the 7/10 events, including survivors, relatives of victims, and evacuated residents. Several law firms and individuals are involved in formulating the prosecution materials.
The indictment highlights a social media campaign that followed Hamas’s attack on Israel, linking the AMP and NSJP organizations to the planning and promotion of the attack. It references a “toolbox” distributed to protest leaders containing instructions on propaganda, managing protests, and recruiting participants. The document encourages actions beyond symbolic gestures and justifies violent confrontation as legitimate resistance. Graphics included in the toolbox depict methods used by Hamas terrorists in a significant attack.
The prosecutors allege that not only Hamas, but also Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, are involved in these organizations’ activities, with a shared goal of influencing US policy and supporting the goals of terrorist organizations. The indictment seeks compensation from the organizations for their collaboration with terrorists and incitement of violence. The legal team involved in the case is committed to presenting strong evidence in court to bring these organizations to justice.
The president of the Greenberg Traurig law firm expressed pride in representing the plaintiffs and emphasized the importance of holding these organizations accountable for their actions in collaboration with terrorists. The article was originally published in “Globes” and addresses the complex legal proceedings surrounding the case.