Last Saturday, the House of Representatives approved a new aid package for Ukraine despite opposition from the MAGA movement. The Biden government had material ready to be sent, pending authorization from Congress, so the effects of this legislative achievement are expected to be rapid. Many observers are relieved, embarrassed, angry, and concerned about what happened. Relief comes from knowing that aid will reach Ukraine in time to help the nation survive the crisis. However, there is embarrassment and anger over the political faction that blocked aid for so long, possibly in support of Vladimir Putin. Concern remains as this faction still holds power and could continue to impede assistance to Ukraine.
Analyzing the myths surrounding aid to Ukraine is important. Contrary to claims, the expense of aid to Ukraine is not a huge burden on the US economy. Additionally, the US does not bear this cost alone, as European allies also contribute. American aid remains crucial as Europe lacks the military hardware to support Ukraine adequately. Drawing parallels to historical aid programs like Franklin Roosevelt’s Lend-Lease, which provided aid to the UK and China before US involvement in WWII is helpful. Like in the past, aid to Ukraine is essential for the nation’s survival, even if some factions oppose it.
The approved aid package, while significant, represents a small fraction of the US GDP. Claims that it will strain the budget or interfere with other priorities are unfounded. While the US has provided more military aid than Europe, European aid commitments to Ukraine surpass American aid. Europe lacks the production capacity to meet Ukraine’s military needs, making American assistance indispensable. The historical context of aid programs and the current situation in Europe highlight the importance of continued US support for Ukraine’s stability and defense.